Log in For International Broadcasters, Distributors, Licensees Search by Cast Name
Yui Natsukawa (夏川結衣)
Why I Dress Up for Love着飾る恋には理由があって 꾸미는 사랑에는 이유가 있어 打扮的戀愛是有理由的 75min × 1ep / 60min × 9eps|Eps 10 Fashionista Kurumi Mashiba works as a publicist for a popular online home décor company. When she launches a social media account to promote the company, she ends up amassing 100,000 followers and becomes a fashion influencer in her own right. But she’s so wrapped up in work that she forgets to renew the lease on her apartment and finds herself thrown out onto the street! Help comes in the form of Kouko Saotome, an older female friend and successful food stylist who lives in a luxury apartment in the heart of trendy Omotesando. Kouko invites Kurumi to move in with her, but it turns out she doesn’t live alone. And so, the stylish Kurumi finds herself living with an eclectic group of men and women very different from her. Don’t miss this heartwarming series packed full of love in all its many forms! Meet Me After School中学聖日記 첫사랑 일기 中學聖日記 67 min x 11 eps|11 episodes Fulfilling a long-cherished dream, school teacher Hijiri Matsunaga is hired at a far-flung countryside middle school where she encounters, Akira Kuroiwa, a 9th grader with mysterious powers. Though 10 years younger than his teacher, Akira falls instantly in love with her and single-mindedly pursues her affections. But Hijiri has a devoted finance, Shotaro, with whom she keeps up a long-distance relationship. Aware that she should not reciprocate her student’s feelings for her, Hijiri eventually finds her heart swayed by Akira’s unremitting love and becomes attracted to him. Deeply conflicted between the affections of a pubescent youth and an elite company man, Hijiri’s “forbidden” love triangle engulfs those around her in this “forbidden yet pure” love story between student and pupil. SIX FOUR: Part 1 / SIX FOUR Part 264 ロクヨン - 前編/後編 64 쇼와 육십사년 64 昭和六十四年 Part 1: 121 min. Part 2: 119 min.
In 2002, a kidnapping has eerie parallels with ‘six-four’, an unsolved case from 1989 on which the Statute of Limitations looms one year hence.
|